Sunday, 9 October 2016
Farewell Europe -- UK PM Theresa May rides anti-migrant Brexit wave ........
With a little help from fellow Tory hopefuls like
Michael Gove and Boris Johnson squabbling for the top job, May saw her
opportunity and grabbed the prize. Thus began the prime ministerial era of Theresa May
in her new avatar as anti-Europe head of
Brexiters. No looking back to any earlier belief or vote.
Losing no time she declared the very first day that “Brexit means
Brexit” and she is sticking to it. Asked
umpteen times what Brexit meant, she has so far fobbed off all questioners by
saying that she is not going to give a “running commentary” on the negotiations
which she proposes to enter into with the European Union. In other words: watch
the show as she unfolds it.
However, she has signalled two
broad and definitive roads which her government intends to travel on the home
front. One is a more interventionist policy to make businesses fall in line on
fair wages for workers and tax avoidance and big bonus culture of corporates. A tall order, perhaps, but a
populist necessary promise. The second road is much more clearly marked with
barriers against new immigrants. Even the more recent immigrants, like nearly two million Eastern
European migrants who arrived over the last
six years, have become pawns on the new
chess board. Their fate depends on the reciprocal treatment of Britons working
in the European Union. No one-way guarantee
for anybody. Nor any one-way
first gesture. Perhaps that is the meaning of ‘hard’ Brexit, so far as the
European migrants are concerned. For the non-Europeans from Asia, Africa or
elsewhere the doors have been long slammed shut, only the rarest of the rare asylum
seekers or refugees to be allowed in .
The new government is determined to keep the tightest closed door policy
on immigration, as indeed it was the central issue in the referendum that had
divided the nation, even families across the land. Amber Rudd, new Home
Secretary (Home Minister in Indian parlance), has hinted that employers could
be asked to reveal how many foreign workers they employed. The measure is aimed
at ensuring that foreign workers should not be able to take jobs that British
workers can do.
The proposal has been widely
attacked by employers’ organisations as well as some influential Tory leaders, besides
the opposition Labour party. Rudd,
however, is not backing away from the plan and putting it up for review and “consultation” within the government. “The object, it seems
, is to name and shame those employers with a proportion of non-UK workers
above some arbitrary level,” said a leading employers’ representative.
Students are the next target of Rudd as she announced that Home Office under her would launch
“consultation” on student migration intake. She raised the prospect of a
multi-tiered visa system tied to English language test and the nature of
subject and the college or institution offering the
course. She said that the current system offered all sorts of students, irrespective
of their ability and the college or university’s quality, favourable employment prospects after finishing their studies.
Her plans have been condemned by academics as well as by the
parliamentary group on international students. The group’s co-chair, Labour MP Paul Blomfield, called
the idea ‘madness” and pointed out that : “ International students bring eight
billion pounds a year to the UK
economy, creating tens of thousands of jobs. Education is one of our most
successful export industries. The only
people cheering today’s announcement
will be our competitors.”
Doctors and medical personnel, the backbone of Britain’s National Health
Service , are also on the government’s
immigration target lists. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt joined the chorus by
announcing that the government would expand
medical education by training 1,500 more doctors and other staff every
year to make health service self-sufficient by 2025. However he didn’t say how
he would stop British doctors’ annual exodus for greener pastures in the
USA, Australia and elsewhere.
What is striking in this new anti-migrant wave since about the year 2,
000 is the phenomenon of what might be called xenophobia against white
Europeans, something which was earlier aimed at only coloured migrants from
Asia, Africa, Caribbean islands and elsewhere. For a long time it appeared that
anti-migrant feeling was aimed at keeping “Fort Europe” white and Christian. Now, of course, it has come to be seen as more inclusive –
keeping even white migrants out of national borders. Germany, on the other hand, has admitted more
than a million non-Christian refugees
from Syria, Iraq and other countries in sharp contrast to countries like Hungary
and the Czech republic who have shut their doors to Muslim migrants on cultural
grounds. An uneven and uneasy Europe, which still remains a magnet for millions from outside.
The only section of immigrants
whose entry Britain and even other countries
don’t want to block are the
bankers and the rich investors. Addressing Wall Street banking representatives
in New York, the Brititish Chancellor, Philip Hammond, categorically said that
Theresa May’s government was not adopting any anti-business stance. He told a TV channel: “ The problem is not highly
skilled and highly paid bankers, brain surgeons, software engineers.” People
(in Britain) recognise that the high earners from abroad “are a positive
contribution to the UK economy.”
So, it is highly unlikely that Britain would do anything that could harm
the City of London, the heart of UK’s financial services industry, even though
it employs nearly 20 per cent workers from outside the UK. Industry groups are
already talking about special visas for wealth creators from outside. After all which banker doesn’t know that Liza
Minnelli song that said something like “Life is a cabaret, my chum" and money
makes the world go round !
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)